Raymond
2012-04-19 06:36:03 UTC
Fighting and dying for oil companirs
All American presidents are committed to war and invading other
nations for oil and other resources. The American people expect it.
So, regardless of who is elected president in 2012, we can depend on
more wars, probably in the Middle East or in Africa. The oil companies
will decide where and when. The president will simply be the announcer
as to where. It's part of his job along with a congress that is
allegedly the only department that is permitted to declare war.
You people speak so lightly of war; you don't know what you're talking
about....Every attempt to make war easy and safe will result in
humiliation and disaster. ... It is only those who have neither fired
a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud
for blood, for vengeance, for desolation. War is hell. ...
---- William Tecumseh Sherman
Every major war in US history was based on a complete fraud with
insiders themselves admitting it.
The moment war is declared. the mass of the people, through some
spiritual alchemy, become convinced that they have willed and executed
the deed themselves. They then, with the exception of a few
malcontents, proceed to allow themselves to be regimented, coerced,
deranged in all the environments of their lives, and turned into a
solid manufactory of destruction toward whatever other people may
have, in the appointed scheme of things, come within the range of the
Government’s disapprobation. The citizen throws off his contempt and
indifference to Government, identifies himself with its purposes,
revives all his military memories and symbols, and the State once more
walks, an august presence, through the imaginations of men. Patriotism
becomes the dominant feeling, and produces immediately that intense
and hopeless confusion between the relations which the individual
bears and should bear toward the society of which he is a
part. .....Wartime brings the ideal of the State out into very clear
relief, and reveals attitudes and tendencies that were hidden. In
times of peace the sense of the State flags in a republic that is not
militarized. For war is essentially the health of the State. ...
Americans love their wars. Killing innocent people and enjoying it is
in our blood
SEE Our young men having great fun in murdering innocent defenseless
citizens in a nation that we invaded --a nation that did nothing to
deserve our military terror.
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/new-american-century/
For the young unemployed American, the military is the answer. Join up
and feel free to kill your neighbors so that America can own all of
the world's oil supply. For War — or at least modern war waged by a
democratic republic against a powerful enemy — seems to achieve for a
nation almost all that the most inflamed political idealist could
desire. And, he that owns the oil owns the world. And soon, we will
own the whole world
This is the killing that Bush administration does not want Americans
to see. From the beginning, the U.S. government has attempted to
censor information about the Iraq/Afghanistan wars
America’s wars are remote. They're remote from us geographically,
remote from us emotionally (unless you're serving in the military or
have a close relative or friend who serves), and remote from our major
media outlets, which have given us no compelling narrative about them,
except that they're being fought by “America’s heroes” against foreign
terrorists and evil-doers. They're even being fought, in significant
part, by remote control — by robotic drones “piloted” by ground-based
operators from a secret network of bases located hundreds, if not
thousands, of miles from the danger of the battlefield.
What “withdrawal” means for an empire
As troops pull out of Iraq, Obama plans more combat forces elsewhere
in the Middle East:
“We will have a robust continuing presence throughout the region,
which is proof of our ongoing commitment to Iraq and to the future of
that region, which holds such promise and should be freed from outside
interference to continue on a pathway to democracy,” Secretary of
State Hillary Rodham Clinton said in Tajikistan after the president’s
announcement
All major wars since the end of WW ii have been for oil, including
Vietnam. If elected, Obama will continue the policy as will Romney
should he become president
Defend The Flag
The wall is full with names of sons
That lost their lives to foreign guns.
Who's to blame? "We're not the ones."
And with these words each leader runs.
Who are these men we pick to lead
That waste our youth and make them bleed?
These must be men of awful need
That can commit this dreadful deed.
These wretched men who live to lie
Are not the ones that fight and die.
They cause this woe and merely sigh
While mother's hearts are made to cry.
"Defend the flag-this is the way."
We never question what they say.
But pain and death will end the day
And in the earth our children lay.
We ask our youth their lives to lend
While our leaders strut and spend.
It's off to Hell these leaders send
Then this madness just might end.
by Raymond
BLACK GOLD HOT GOLD - The Rise of Fascism in the American Energy
Business BLACK GOLD HOT GOLD Chapter Three
by Marshall Douglas Smith
The whole 20 year Viet Nam "war" from 1955 to 1975 was an oil scam. by
Marshall Douglas Smith
In 1945, at the end of WWII, when the Japanese surrendered,
General Douglas MacArthur became the military Governor of Japan.
MacArthur's assistant was Laurence Rockefeller, one of John D's four
grandsons. Just before the Japanese surrendered, the US had been
preparing for a massive invasion of the Japanese home islands and had
stockpiled vast supplies of weapons and munitions on the island of
Okinawa. Enough weaponry to invade Japan. What ever happened to all
those military supplies?
With Vice-governor Laurence Rockefeller's assistance most of them
were sold to the leader of Viet Nam, Ho Chi Minh, for something like
one US dollar and Ho's "goodwill." Why would Laurence do that? That
was US taxpayer property. Ho Chi Minh had been an ally to help fight
the Japanese during the war. But the Chinese had been an even greater
ally, so why didn't the weapons go to China? Those weapons might have
prevented Mao Tse Tung from taking over China just four years later if
they had been given to China. But that wasn't the plan. From where did
Mao get his weapons?
In the 1920's an insider secret became known to a few people. It
was published in an exhaustive world resources survey book written by
a renowned world-traveling geologist named Hoover, who later became a
US President. Not many copies were printed and few people read the
book. The secret was that one of the world's largest potential oil
fields ran along the coast of the South China Sea right off French
Indo-China, now known as Viet Nam. But in the 1920's the method of
deep sea oil drilling had not yet been developed. In 1945, the French
still held small oil-poor Viet Nam as a colony. Laurence knew about
Hoover's book and the off shore oilfields. The French could be driven
out if the Vietnamese nationals, lead by Ho Chi Minh, could be
supplied with weapons. Did the French know about this?
Laurence Rockefeller thought he could trick Ho Chi Minh by
offering him the weapons to drive out the French and then in return
Standard would take over the as yet undeveloped offshore fields. But
in 1954 when Vietnamese General Giap finally defeated and drove out
the French at Dien Bien Phu, Ho reneged on the deal. Since by then,
everybody including the French, the Vietnamese, the Japanese and the
Chinese had all read the same Hoover resource book and knew there was
a vast supply of oil off the Vietnamese coast. Many people have
wondered why the French have been so recalcitrant toward the US ever
since French President Charles DeGaul wanted to pull out of NATO in
the mid-1950's.
Ho Chi Minh would not let Standard Oil simply walk in and walk
off with all the Vietnamese oil. So as before, any country which owns
the oil is branded as "communist" since they hold the oil as
"community property" and won't allow private corporations, like
Standard, to develop the fields and steal the oil. In this case, young
American's themselves where "hired" directly to be the "fascists" to
go fight the Vietnamese "communists."
The whole 20 year Viet Nam "war" from 1955 to 1975 was an oil
scam. And all during the "war," Vietnamese General Giap fought the
Americans with weapons he got from Laurence for a dollar. Did you ever
wonder why the US, despite, greatly superior weapons, and the loss of
57,000 Americans and half a million Vietnamese, never won the "war?"
Ever wonder why the US President issued such strange "rules of
engagement" for the American troops that made sure they didn't win?
Ever wonder why Henry Kissinger, a personal assistant to Nelson
Rockefeller spent so much time in the Viet Nam/Paris Peace talks which
never went anywhere but simply dragged on for years. Maybe winning the
"war" wasn't part of the plan of the Empire of Energy. Maybe the
timing of the "war" was more important.
In the 1950's a method of undersea oil exploration was perfected
which used small explosions deep in the water and then recorded the
sound echos bouncing off the various layers of rock below. The
surveyor could then determine the exact location of the arched salt
domes which hold the accumulated oil beneath them. But if this method
were used off the Viet Nam coast on property Standard didn't own or
have the rights to, the Vietnamese, the Chinese, the Japanese and
probably even the French would quickly run to the United Nations and
complain that America was stealing the oil, and that would shut down
the operation.
In 1964, after Viet Nam was divided into North and South, and the
contrived Gulf of Tonkin incident, several US aircraft carriers were
stationed offshore of Viet Nam and the "war" was started. Every day
jet planes would take off from the carriers, bomb locations in North
and South Vietnam, and then using normal military procedure when
returning would dump their unsafe or unused bombs in the ocean before
landing back on the carriers. Safe ordnance drop zones were designated
for this purpose away from the carriers.
Even close-up observers would only notice many small explosions
occurring daily in the waters of the South China Sea and thought it
was only part of the "war." The US Navy carriers had begun Operation
Linebacker One, and Standard Oil had begun its ten year oil survey of
the seabed off of Viet Nam. And the Vietnamese, Chinese and everybody
else around, including the Americans, were none the wiser. The oil
survey hardly cost Standard Oil a nickel, the US taxpayers paid for
it.
In 1995, in a multi-hour BBC TV documentary broadcast about the
oil industry, the president of one of the oil companies, a spin-off of
Standard, stated, ".. It was quite a coincidence, that we finished our
offshore oil survey on the very last day of the war, just as the last
helicopter was leaving the roof of the embassy in Saigon." A
coincidence?
Fifteen years later, after North and South Viet Nam were unified
and all the dust settled and most people had forgotten about the
"war," the Vietnamese decided they needed some cash and would allow
offshore oil exploration. They divided up their coastal area into many
oil lots and let foreign companies bid on the lots, with the proviso
that Viet Nam got a cut of the action.
Oil companies from 12 countries put in bids. Norway's Statoil,
British Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell, even Russia, Germany and
Australia all put in bids. But when those countries drilled in their
oil lots they all came up with dry holes. Only the "American" company
had gushers and since 1990 has pulled billions of dollars out of their
Golden Dragon, Blue Lotus, and White Tiger oil fields in the South
China Sea off Viet Nam. Coincidence? Were they just lucky? Or did they
know something those other oil companies didn't?
In order to cover for the fact that the Viet Nam "war" was a
"phoney" war with the Vietnamese branded as "communists," and the US
as a country having no intention of winning, the US would need to
withdraw as soon as the oil survey was done. A reason would be needed
to explain the withdrawal. In the late 1960's Standard recruited large
numbers of idealistic youth who were against the war and the military
draft. The oil companies supplied them with monetary assistance and
organization.
Those oil-backed and organized youth became the large anti-war
demonstrations of the 60's and 70's. Almost none of the demonstrators
knew they were being used. Most people still believe the "war" ended
because of the strong US sentiment against the "war," and President
Nixon's withdrawal plan was a reaction to the demonstrators. There is
too much information which explains the strange relationship between
Richard Nixon and Nelson Rockefeller, the Nixon withdrawal plan and
the resulting Watergate incident and Nelson's rise to power to become
Vice President after Nixon resigned, so I will explain that later.
So it appears there are many oil companies but they are, in fact,
all under one controlling marketeer, BP also known as Standard Oil,
which sets the world price of energy. Ever wonder why President G.W.
Bush wanted to open up new drilling in Alaska? There is a vast new
undeveloped oil field discovered in 1989 around and under the Caspian
Sea in central southern Russia. This one oil field is larger than any
other field ever discovered. This oil could be sent out through the
Siberian Pipeline to the Arctic Sea, then down the Alaska Pipeline, as
is the Black Sea oil. Something would need to account for the greatly
increased and continuous flow of oil in the Alaska pipeline.
New drilling in Alaska, whether oil is found or not, could be
used to explain why so much oil is still coming from the Alaska
pipeline. Nobody ever mentioned that the North Slope Alaska oil
fields, around the Duck Island Western Facility, operated by BP, were
running dry and that was the reason why new drilling was needed. Maybe
because its not true. Nobody ever mentioned that the Prudhoe Bay
Eastern Facility, just a mile or so east of Duck Island, also operated
by BP, at the very top of the Alaska Pipeline is a harbor. Maybe
nobody wanted you to know.
And exactly where is this new freshly discovered mother of all
oil fields in southern Russia? In a province called Chechnya. Is it
any wonder the Chechens wanted to become an independent state? Is it
any wonder there had been an ongoing ten year war between the Russian
and Chechen troops. Did the Russians "brand" the Chechen rebels as
"communists" because they want to keep their own oil? Most Russian
mothers have no clue why their sons were sent to die in Chechnya. The
same was true of the many Russian mothers whose sons died in
Afghanistan. And also the very same is true of many American mothers
whose sons died in Viet Nam.
The vast new oilfield under Chechnya, by itself, could meet the
world's needs for energy for several hundred years. This new oil
supply was far more than could be handled by the aging Trans-Siberia
and Alaska pipelines. With the collapse of the USSR in 1991, the
Russian oil could then be marketed directly. A new overland transport
method needed to be built. An obvious and short method would be to
build a pipeline westward from the Caspian Sea to the Black Sea and
then existing oil tanker ships could take the oil across the Black
Sea, through the narrow Bosporus channel at Istanbul, Turkey to the
Mediterranean Sea and then on to the rest of the world.
There was only one problem with that route. The older Russian oil
fields around the Black Sea still produced enough oil to create a
daily traffic jam of tanker ships through the narrow Bosporus
channel.
That long channel is barely wide enough in some places for two ships
to pass each other. The Turks live in constant fear of an ecological
disaster caused by an oil tanker accident on the very doorstep of
Istanbul, which surrounds the channel.
The Bosporus Channel was already beyond the safe limit for tanker
traffic so the massive supply of new Chechen oil could not be shipped
that way. Seven other long pipeline routes had been proposed in the
1990's. All of them required reaching the Mediterranean Sea by going
through politically unstable regions such as eastern Turkey, Syria or
Lebanon, all of which are areas of unrest and open to terrorist
attack. None of those routes were viable.
In 1995 a seemingly safe and short alternative route was
discovered to get around the unsafe overloaded Bosporus Channel in
Turkey. The oil tankers on the Black Sea, instead of going south
through the narrow Bosporus, would turn northward up the wide Danube
River toward Europe. But then at Belgrade, in Serbian Yugoslavia the
tankers would make a quick left turn up a tributary river, unload the
oil, and with only a short 50 mile pipeline could reach the large
Mediterranean seaport of Tirana, Albania and then on to the world. It
looked cheap and easy. And where would that short pipeline be built?
Across a small province called Kosovo. If only Kosovo could be placed
under some international control to eliminate terrorist attacks and
ensure a safe pipeline.
The US Air Force tried to put Serbia and Kosovo under NATO
control in 1999. It almost worked. But, Albania was unlike all the
other old Yugoslavian ethnic states which had been client states of
the USSR under the dictator Tito. Albania, alone in that region, had
been a client state of China since 1949. The Chinese had long used
Tirana, Albania as a European opium and heroin shipping point, in an
operation far larger than the "French Connection" in Marseilles. The
Albanians still maintain ties with China.
The Chinese, did not want to see large amounts of new energy
supplies flowing to the west under BP-Standard control. The Chinese
supported and used the "ethnic-Albanian rebels," since the breakup of
Yugoslavia in the early 1990's, to ensure continuous unrest in the
whole region around Kosovo, Serbia, Bosnia and Macedonia, and thus no
pipeline. Ever wonder why the Chinese embassy in Belgrade was
"accidently" bombed and obliterated in 1999? The US Air Force claimed
the old street maps their pilots were reading didn't show the Chinese
Embassy. You can fool some of the people some of the time, but not
always. Within a year the Empire of Energy would find an alternative.
To most Americans and to the rest of the world that alternative would
look like a very strange Presidential election.
(End of Chapter Three)
For those Americans who argued that there was no oil in Vietnam to
fight about:
Vietnam is increasingly an important supplier of oil to regional
markets and may emerge as a significant natural gas exporter in the
future. The making of Vietnam's oil giant
By Andrew Symon
HO CHI MINH CITY - PetroVietnam, Vietnam's dominant state oil-and-gas
group, is bidding to emerge as a new force in international energy
markets. Following the proven model of China's successful state-owned
petroleum companies, CNOOC, CNPC-PetroChina and Sinopec, and with an
eye on Malaysia's highly profitable state-owned Petronas, PetroVietnam
is leveraging off its strong domestic position to develop a growing
international portfolio of energy interests and operations. Crude-oil
exports have powered Vietnam's recent rapid economic growth,
representing the country's largest single export item
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/II25Ae02.html
http://www.oilcompanies.net/oil1.htm
Let us prey.
Take the tour on Nam
http://pzzzz.tripod.com/nampictour.html
Killing Without Conscience : Iraq - The Hidden War
The War for Oil
This is the story of the hidden agenda behind the invasion of Iraq.
How much has this war really been about control over a dwindling
resource?
Middle East
In the pipeline: More regime change
By Hooman Peimani
An Israeli daily, Ha'aretz, has reported that Israel is seriously
considering restarting a strategically important oil pipeline that
once transferred oil from the Iraqi city of Mosul to Israel's northern
port of Haifa. Given the Israeli claim of a positive US approach to
the plan, the Israeli project provides grounds for a theory that the
ongoing war against Iraq is in part a joint US, British and Israeli
design for reshaping the Middle East to serve their particular
interests, including their oil requirements.
According to the daily, Israeli National Infrastructure Minister Yosef
Paritzky considers the pipeline project as economically justifiable as
it would reduce the country's cost of oil imports. This is currently
very high, as Israel imports oil from Russia. There would also be a
strategic justification for the project, as importing oil from an oil
supplier in Israel's close proximity would increase its fuel security
and would address its major handicap, that is, its total dependence on
imported fuel from far-away suppliers. While living in the oil-rich
Middle East, the Israelis cannot count on regional oil exporters
because of the existing Arab-Israeli conflict. Prior to the 1979
Iranian revolution, Iran, which was on friendly terms with Israel,
provided its oil requirements. That arrangement ended in 1979 when the
new Iranian revolutionary regime cut ties with Israel.
Paritzky has requested an assessment of the Mosul-Haifa pipeline's
current state, which ceased to operate in 1948. Presumably, the
pipeline will require major repair and/or upgrading, if not an
overhaul, as it has not been in use for more than half a century.
However, its full operation, including the required repair work, needs
the consent of Iraq, the would-be oil supplier, and Syria, a country
neighboring both Iraq and Israel, through which the pipeline passes.
Iraqi consent will be out of the question as long as the current
regime of Saddam Hussein is in power. As acknowledged by the Israeli
minister, a prerequisite for the project is, therefore, a new regime
in Baghdad with friendly ties with Israel. However, such a regime, if
ever it comes to power, will still require Syria's consent to
operationalize the pipeline. Given the overall political environment
in the Middle East and Israel's continued occupation of Syria's Golan
Heights, the existing Syrian regime will never grant its consent as
long as the status quo prevails. As stated by the Iranian government,
during the Iran-Iraq war (1980-88) when Iraq enjoyed cordial and close
relations with Israel's mentor, the United States, Israel tried, but
failed, to resume the oil flow through the pipeline. Syria, a friend
of Iran and an enemy of Iraq, blocked the flow of Iraqi oil.
Hence, unless the pipeline were redirected through Jordan, another
country bordering Israel and Iraq with normalized relations with
Israel, the pipeline project will require a different regime in Syria.
In other words, regime change in both Iraq and Syria is the
prerequisite for the project. As Paritzky did not mention a
redirecting option, it is safe to suggest that the Israelis are also
optimistic about a regime change in Syria in the near future.
Oil pipelines are a highly vulnerable means of exporting oil,
requiring a predictable long-term reliability of the countries through
which they pass. Knowing this, the Israelis can only begin their
technical assessment of the pipeline once they are convinced that the
existing political barriers can be overcome. This requires new regimes
in Baghdad and Damascus.
According to the Israeli minister, the United States will back his
project since the pipeline would bring Iraqi oil directly from Iraq to
the Mediterranean. In such a case, the Americans could bypass the
Persian Gulf for their imported Iraqi oil, while having secured access
to the world's second-largest oil reserves. Especially since the early
1990s, they have repeatedly expressed their concern about over-
reliance on the Persian Gulf for their oil imports, which contains
more than 60 percent of the world's proven oil reserves. Given the
concentration of the major oil exporters in that region, its
instability could interrupt or completely stop the flow of oil by oil
tankers, with a consequent major impact on the US economy, as it is so
dependent on oil.
To decrease their vulnerability to such a worst-case scenario, the
Americans have sought to diversify their oil suppliers. Apart from the
Caspian oil-exporters, they have resorted to non-OPEC (Organization of
Petroleum Exporting Countries) African countries (Chad and Angola),
whose resources are also closer to the United States than those of the
Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea. However, these alternative suppliers
could only allay the US fear for a while, given the small size of
their oil deposits. Thus, in the long run, the US will have to import
heavily from the Persian Gulf region, where existing oil reserves will
outlast those of other regions, and while some of its oil-rich
countries, such as Iran, keep finding new oilfields.
Given this situation, finding reliable alternative export routes and
means to sea routes and oil tankers for Persian Gulf oil exports is
the long-term solution for the Americans requiring an increasing
amount of imported oil. In this regard, land-based pipelines to carry
oil to easily accessible warm-water open seas such as the
Mediterranean would be a suitable option. A fully operational Mosul-
Haifa pipeline could address that US problem, while satisfying
Israel's oil requirements at same time.
The Israeli oil pipeline plan, though, runs contrary to the stated US
war objectives in Iraq. The two key members of the "coalition of the
willing" - the United States and the United Kingdom - have rejected
oil as a motivation for the war, a point not taken seriously by many
all over the world. Nevertheless, the Israeli plan, the US-stated goal
of securing Iraqi oilfields, including those of Mosul, and the
declared US objective of a regime change in Iraq offer some evidence
to the contrary.
Against this background, the US government's growing anti-Syrian
rhetoric, including accusing Syria of supplying military equipment to
Iraq, may well be the initial stage toward the expansion of the war to
Syria. If this happens, it could lead to a regime change there to
serve various purposes, including the cooperation of Syria in future
oil exports via the Mosul-Haifa pipeline.
Dr Hooman Peimani works as an independent consultant with
international organizations in Geneva and does research in
international relations.
(©2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact
***@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication
policies.)
The Money Programme broadcast Wednesday 26 March 7.30pm BBC2
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8582.htm
Oil - Oil and world power
http://www.americanforeignrelations.com/O-W/Oil-Oil-and-world-power.htm
Oil company wars produce work for many besides military ...Oil
Companies Hiring In Afghanistan/Iraq. Companies Hiring Now
Jobs with Contractors in Afghanistan and the surrounding Countries
Places like Afghanistan and other overseas job market in the region
are changing fast. Employment opportunities are plenty, even though,
the number of people leaving the Armed Forces flood the market with
military personnel with overseas experience and security clearances.
In addition, there are thousands of contractors moving from one
contracting company to another. But, despite these prevailing market
conditions, with the right training and knowledge about jobs, one can
find lots of well paid employment opportunities with American, British
and German Contractors in Afghanistan and other areas surrounding it.
Oil pipeline through Afghanistan to Arabian Sea will not be complete
until 2014. Jobs will be available even beyond completion of
pipeline, especially in security work.
This pipeline will carry $3-5 trillion in oil and natural gas from the
Caspian Sea basin via Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan,where
ships docked in Arabian Sea ports will then carry that fuel to energy
hungry Asia.
This will yield enormous profits for investors,and the atmosphere will
continue to heat from the increasing use of those fossil fuels
SEE Map
http://ringnebula.com/Oil/Pipeline.htm
Vets looking for work should get in touch with the State Department.
With this new Taliban attack activity, more Americans will be killed,
especially the troops assigned to guard the newly constructed oil
pipeline running through Afghanistan to the oil tankers waiting in the
Arabian Sea and bound for American and British refineries. The oil
compnies are hiring , especially returning veterans willing to return
to Afghanistan and take up the jobs that the military has been working
at. The jobs pay well ..... contracts must be signed promising that
the employees will remain for a specific length of time. However, the
risks are great and applicants should be warned of the dangers.
The oil companies had experienced severe opposition from the local
population until President Obama sent an additional 40,000 troops to
protect the workers building the long awaited pipeline to the Arbian
Sea.. Still, the locals cannot be trusted to permit the line to be
completed.
Jobs in Afghanistan - Jobline International For several international
companies, we're looking to recruit:
Oil Companies Hiring In Afghanistan/Iraq. Companies Hiring Now
Salary: Negotiable
Job Placement Service for Jobs with Contractors in Afghanistan
Experts in pipe fitting a priority... high paying contracts guaranteed
employment thru 3/2014. The hiring companies are a lot more secretive
than they used to be and only few jobs get advertised. ..hiring former
military with pipeline security experience.
WILL DO ANY WORK ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD OIL;@GAS OR SECURITY IN
AFGANISTAN, . ADB staff and staff consultant experts are analyzing the
demand ..
Archived Oil and Gas Jobs in Afghanistan | Oil and Gas Jobs
Please remember - With troops returning home Afghanistan is currently
a more dangerous place for foreigners to work in, so do not apply for
any position unless you are aware of the risks ..After all, oil is
what this war is all about and losing Americans for oil is not a
popular topic.
Administration Jobs in Afghanistan Alternative Energy Jobs in
Afghanistan
Commercial/Financial Jobs in Afghanistan Design/Software Jobs in
Afghanistan
Drilling Jobs in Afghanistan Engineering Jobs in Afghanistan
Environment Jobs in Afghanistan FEA/FEM Jobs in Afghanistan
Geoscience Jobs in Afghanistan Health & Safety Jobs in Afghanistan
Human Resources Jobs in Afghanistan Inspection/Expediting Jobs in
Afghanistan
IT/Communications Jobs in Afghanistan Legal Jobs in Afghanistan
Logistics/Transport Jobs in Afghanistan Management Jobs in
Afghanistan
Marine (Diving/ROV) Jobs in Afghanistan Marine (Ship) Jobs in
Afghanistan
Mining Jobs in Afghanistan Nuclear Jobs in Afghanistan
Operations Jobs in Afghanistan Other Jobs in Afghanistan
Personnel Training Jobs in Afghanistan Plant (Refinery, Gas...) Jobs
in Afghanistan
Procurement Jobs in Afghanistan Quality (QA/QC) Jobs in Afghanistan
Sales/Marketing Jobs in Afghanistan Technician Level Jobs in
Afghanistan
Trades (Skilled) Jobs in Afghanistan
http://www.oil-offshore-marine.com/directory/country/
http://www.jobline.net/jobafghan1.htm
Turkmenistan - Afghanistan - Pakistan Pipeline Employment Availble
Now.
If you intend to be part of that effort, you have to understand that
conditions are harsh, primitive and hazardous. Prior experience in the
military will be a big help in adapting to the environment and doing
the job. Most jobs will be offered for 12-month tours, with options to
extend.Work also available in Iraq's newly opened oil fields.
Veterans welcome to apply.
The number of interested companies will depend on the skills you
offer. These companies will then directly contact you, when they have
an opening and need your skills, agreeing directly with you their
employment conditions.
War is the Health of the American Empire.
Join in the fight for world oil domination.
All American presidents are committed to war and invading other
nations for oil and other resources. The American people expect it.
So, regardless of who is elected president in 2012, we can depend on
more wars, probably in the Middle East or in Africa. The oil companies
will decide where and when. The president will simply be the announcer
as to where. It's part of his job along with a congress that is
allegedly the only department that is permitted to declare war.
You people speak so lightly of war; you don't know what you're talking
about....Every attempt to make war easy and safe will result in
humiliation and disaster. ... It is only those who have neither fired
a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud
for blood, for vengeance, for desolation. War is hell. ...
---- William Tecumseh Sherman
Every major war in US history was based on a complete fraud with
insiders themselves admitting it.
The moment war is declared. the mass of the people, through some
spiritual alchemy, become convinced that they have willed and executed
the deed themselves. They then, with the exception of a few
malcontents, proceed to allow themselves to be regimented, coerced,
deranged in all the environments of their lives, and turned into a
solid manufactory of destruction toward whatever other people may
have, in the appointed scheme of things, come within the range of the
Government’s disapprobation. The citizen throws off his contempt and
indifference to Government, identifies himself with its purposes,
revives all his military memories and symbols, and the State once more
walks, an august presence, through the imaginations of men. Patriotism
becomes the dominant feeling, and produces immediately that intense
and hopeless confusion between the relations which the individual
bears and should bear toward the society of which he is a
part. .....Wartime brings the ideal of the State out into very clear
relief, and reveals attitudes and tendencies that were hidden. In
times of peace the sense of the State flags in a republic that is not
militarized. For war is essentially the health of the State. ...
Americans love their wars. Killing innocent people and enjoying it is
in our blood
SEE Our young men having great fun in murdering innocent defenseless
citizens in a nation that we invaded --a nation that did nothing to
deserve our military terror.
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/new-american-century/
For the young unemployed American, the military is the answer. Join up
and feel free to kill your neighbors so that America can own all of
the world's oil supply. For War — or at least modern war waged by a
democratic republic against a powerful enemy — seems to achieve for a
nation almost all that the most inflamed political idealist could
desire. And, he that owns the oil owns the world. And soon, we will
own the whole world
This is the killing that Bush administration does not want Americans
to see. From the beginning, the U.S. government has attempted to
censor information about the Iraq/Afghanistan wars
America’s wars are remote. They're remote from us geographically,
remote from us emotionally (unless you're serving in the military or
have a close relative or friend who serves), and remote from our major
media outlets, which have given us no compelling narrative about them,
except that they're being fought by “America’s heroes” against foreign
terrorists and evil-doers. They're even being fought, in significant
part, by remote control — by robotic drones “piloted” by ground-based
operators from a secret network of bases located hundreds, if not
thousands, of miles from the danger of the battlefield.
What “withdrawal” means for an empire
As troops pull out of Iraq, Obama plans more combat forces elsewhere
in the Middle East:
“We will have a robust continuing presence throughout the region,
which is proof of our ongoing commitment to Iraq and to the future of
that region, which holds such promise and should be freed from outside
interference to continue on a pathway to democracy,” Secretary of
State Hillary Rodham Clinton said in Tajikistan after the president’s
announcement
All major wars since the end of WW ii have been for oil, including
Vietnam. If elected, Obama will continue the policy as will Romney
should he become president
Defend The Flag
The wall is full with names of sons
That lost their lives to foreign guns.
Who's to blame? "We're not the ones."
And with these words each leader runs.
Who are these men we pick to lead
That waste our youth and make them bleed?
These must be men of awful need
That can commit this dreadful deed.
These wretched men who live to lie
Are not the ones that fight and die.
They cause this woe and merely sigh
While mother's hearts are made to cry.
"Defend the flag-this is the way."
We never question what they say.
But pain and death will end the day
And in the earth our children lay.
We ask our youth their lives to lend
While our leaders strut and spend.
It's off to Hell these leaders send
Then this madness just might end.
by Raymond
BLACK GOLD HOT GOLD - The Rise of Fascism in the American Energy
Business BLACK GOLD HOT GOLD Chapter Three
by Marshall Douglas Smith
The whole 20 year Viet Nam "war" from 1955 to 1975 was an oil scam. by
Marshall Douglas Smith
In 1945, at the end of WWII, when the Japanese surrendered,
General Douglas MacArthur became the military Governor of Japan.
MacArthur's assistant was Laurence Rockefeller, one of John D's four
grandsons. Just before the Japanese surrendered, the US had been
preparing for a massive invasion of the Japanese home islands and had
stockpiled vast supplies of weapons and munitions on the island of
Okinawa. Enough weaponry to invade Japan. What ever happened to all
those military supplies?
With Vice-governor Laurence Rockefeller's assistance most of them
were sold to the leader of Viet Nam, Ho Chi Minh, for something like
one US dollar and Ho's "goodwill." Why would Laurence do that? That
was US taxpayer property. Ho Chi Minh had been an ally to help fight
the Japanese during the war. But the Chinese had been an even greater
ally, so why didn't the weapons go to China? Those weapons might have
prevented Mao Tse Tung from taking over China just four years later if
they had been given to China. But that wasn't the plan. From where did
Mao get his weapons?
In the 1920's an insider secret became known to a few people. It
was published in an exhaustive world resources survey book written by
a renowned world-traveling geologist named Hoover, who later became a
US President. Not many copies were printed and few people read the
book. The secret was that one of the world's largest potential oil
fields ran along the coast of the South China Sea right off French
Indo-China, now known as Viet Nam. But in the 1920's the method of
deep sea oil drilling had not yet been developed. In 1945, the French
still held small oil-poor Viet Nam as a colony. Laurence knew about
Hoover's book and the off shore oilfields. The French could be driven
out if the Vietnamese nationals, lead by Ho Chi Minh, could be
supplied with weapons. Did the French know about this?
Laurence Rockefeller thought he could trick Ho Chi Minh by
offering him the weapons to drive out the French and then in return
Standard would take over the as yet undeveloped offshore fields. But
in 1954 when Vietnamese General Giap finally defeated and drove out
the French at Dien Bien Phu, Ho reneged on the deal. Since by then,
everybody including the French, the Vietnamese, the Japanese and the
Chinese had all read the same Hoover resource book and knew there was
a vast supply of oil off the Vietnamese coast. Many people have
wondered why the French have been so recalcitrant toward the US ever
since French President Charles DeGaul wanted to pull out of NATO in
the mid-1950's.
Ho Chi Minh would not let Standard Oil simply walk in and walk
off with all the Vietnamese oil. So as before, any country which owns
the oil is branded as "communist" since they hold the oil as
"community property" and won't allow private corporations, like
Standard, to develop the fields and steal the oil. In this case, young
American's themselves where "hired" directly to be the "fascists" to
go fight the Vietnamese "communists."
The whole 20 year Viet Nam "war" from 1955 to 1975 was an oil
scam. And all during the "war," Vietnamese General Giap fought the
Americans with weapons he got from Laurence for a dollar. Did you ever
wonder why the US, despite, greatly superior weapons, and the loss of
57,000 Americans and half a million Vietnamese, never won the "war?"
Ever wonder why the US President issued such strange "rules of
engagement" for the American troops that made sure they didn't win?
Ever wonder why Henry Kissinger, a personal assistant to Nelson
Rockefeller spent so much time in the Viet Nam/Paris Peace talks which
never went anywhere but simply dragged on for years. Maybe winning the
"war" wasn't part of the plan of the Empire of Energy. Maybe the
timing of the "war" was more important.
In the 1950's a method of undersea oil exploration was perfected
which used small explosions deep in the water and then recorded the
sound echos bouncing off the various layers of rock below. The
surveyor could then determine the exact location of the arched salt
domes which hold the accumulated oil beneath them. But if this method
were used off the Viet Nam coast on property Standard didn't own or
have the rights to, the Vietnamese, the Chinese, the Japanese and
probably even the French would quickly run to the United Nations and
complain that America was stealing the oil, and that would shut down
the operation.
In 1964, after Viet Nam was divided into North and South, and the
contrived Gulf of Tonkin incident, several US aircraft carriers were
stationed offshore of Viet Nam and the "war" was started. Every day
jet planes would take off from the carriers, bomb locations in North
and South Vietnam, and then using normal military procedure when
returning would dump their unsafe or unused bombs in the ocean before
landing back on the carriers. Safe ordnance drop zones were designated
for this purpose away from the carriers.
Even close-up observers would only notice many small explosions
occurring daily in the waters of the South China Sea and thought it
was only part of the "war." The US Navy carriers had begun Operation
Linebacker One, and Standard Oil had begun its ten year oil survey of
the seabed off of Viet Nam. And the Vietnamese, Chinese and everybody
else around, including the Americans, were none the wiser. The oil
survey hardly cost Standard Oil a nickel, the US taxpayers paid for
it.
In 1995, in a multi-hour BBC TV documentary broadcast about the
oil industry, the president of one of the oil companies, a spin-off of
Standard, stated, ".. It was quite a coincidence, that we finished our
offshore oil survey on the very last day of the war, just as the last
helicopter was leaving the roof of the embassy in Saigon." A
coincidence?
Fifteen years later, after North and South Viet Nam were unified
and all the dust settled and most people had forgotten about the
"war," the Vietnamese decided they needed some cash and would allow
offshore oil exploration. They divided up their coastal area into many
oil lots and let foreign companies bid on the lots, with the proviso
that Viet Nam got a cut of the action.
Oil companies from 12 countries put in bids. Norway's Statoil,
British Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell, even Russia, Germany and
Australia all put in bids. But when those countries drilled in their
oil lots they all came up with dry holes. Only the "American" company
had gushers and since 1990 has pulled billions of dollars out of their
Golden Dragon, Blue Lotus, and White Tiger oil fields in the South
China Sea off Viet Nam. Coincidence? Were they just lucky? Or did they
know something those other oil companies didn't?
In order to cover for the fact that the Viet Nam "war" was a
"phoney" war with the Vietnamese branded as "communists," and the US
as a country having no intention of winning, the US would need to
withdraw as soon as the oil survey was done. A reason would be needed
to explain the withdrawal. In the late 1960's Standard recruited large
numbers of idealistic youth who were against the war and the military
draft. The oil companies supplied them with monetary assistance and
organization.
Those oil-backed and organized youth became the large anti-war
demonstrations of the 60's and 70's. Almost none of the demonstrators
knew they were being used. Most people still believe the "war" ended
because of the strong US sentiment against the "war," and President
Nixon's withdrawal plan was a reaction to the demonstrators. There is
too much information which explains the strange relationship between
Richard Nixon and Nelson Rockefeller, the Nixon withdrawal plan and
the resulting Watergate incident and Nelson's rise to power to become
Vice President after Nixon resigned, so I will explain that later.
So it appears there are many oil companies but they are, in fact,
all under one controlling marketeer, BP also known as Standard Oil,
which sets the world price of energy. Ever wonder why President G.W.
Bush wanted to open up new drilling in Alaska? There is a vast new
undeveloped oil field discovered in 1989 around and under the Caspian
Sea in central southern Russia. This one oil field is larger than any
other field ever discovered. This oil could be sent out through the
Siberian Pipeline to the Arctic Sea, then down the Alaska Pipeline, as
is the Black Sea oil. Something would need to account for the greatly
increased and continuous flow of oil in the Alaska pipeline.
New drilling in Alaska, whether oil is found or not, could be
used to explain why so much oil is still coming from the Alaska
pipeline. Nobody ever mentioned that the North Slope Alaska oil
fields, around the Duck Island Western Facility, operated by BP, were
running dry and that was the reason why new drilling was needed. Maybe
because its not true. Nobody ever mentioned that the Prudhoe Bay
Eastern Facility, just a mile or so east of Duck Island, also operated
by BP, at the very top of the Alaska Pipeline is a harbor. Maybe
nobody wanted you to know.
And exactly where is this new freshly discovered mother of all
oil fields in southern Russia? In a province called Chechnya. Is it
any wonder the Chechens wanted to become an independent state? Is it
any wonder there had been an ongoing ten year war between the Russian
and Chechen troops. Did the Russians "brand" the Chechen rebels as
"communists" because they want to keep their own oil? Most Russian
mothers have no clue why their sons were sent to die in Chechnya. The
same was true of the many Russian mothers whose sons died in
Afghanistan. And also the very same is true of many American mothers
whose sons died in Viet Nam.
The vast new oilfield under Chechnya, by itself, could meet the
world's needs for energy for several hundred years. This new oil
supply was far more than could be handled by the aging Trans-Siberia
and Alaska pipelines. With the collapse of the USSR in 1991, the
Russian oil could then be marketed directly. A new overland transport
method needed to be built. An obvious and short method would be to
build a pipeline westward from the Caspian Sea to the Black Sea and
then existing oil tanker ships could take the oil across the Black
Sea, through the narrow Bosporus channel at Istanbul, Turkey to the
Mediterranean Sea and then on to the rest of the world.
There was only one problem with that route. The older Russian oil
fields around the Black Sea still produced enough oil to create a
daily traffic jam of tanker ships through the narrow Bosporus
channel.
That long channel is barely wide enough in some places for two ships
to pass each other. The Turks live in constant fear of an ecological
disaster caused by an oil tanker accident on the very doorstep of
Istanbul, which surrounds the channel.
The Bosporus Channel was already beyond the safe limit for tanker
traffic so the massive supply of new Chechen oil could not be shipped
that way. Seven other long pipeline routes had been proposed in the
1990's. All of them required reaching the Mediterranean Sea by going
through politically unstable regions such as eastern Turkey, Syria or
Lebanon, all of which are areas of unrest and open to terrorist
attack. None of those routes were viable.
In 1995 a seemingly safe and short alternative route was
discovered to get around the unsafe overloaded Bosporus Channel in
Turkey. The oil tankers on the Black Sea, instead of going south
through the narrow Bosporus, would turn northward up the wide Danube
River toward Europe. But then at Belgrade, in Serbian Yugoslavia the
tankers would make a quick left turn up a tributary river, unload the
oil, and with only a short 50 mile pipeline could reach the large
Mediterranean seaport of Tirana, Albania and then on to the world. It
looked cheap and easy. And where would that short pipeline be built?
Across a small province called Kosovo. If only Kosovo could be placed
under some international control to eliminate terrorist attacks and
ensure a safe pipeline.
The US Air Force tried to put Serbia and Kosovo under NATO
control in 1999. It almost worked. But, Albania was unlike all the
other old Yugoslavian ethnic states which had been client states of
the USSR under the dictator Tito. Albania, alone in that region, had
been a client state of China since 1949. The Chinese had long used
Tirana, Albania as a European opium and heroin shipping point, in an
operation far larger than the "French Connection" in Marseilles. The
Albanians still maintain ties with China.
The Chinese, did not want to see large amounts of new energy
supplies flowing to the west under BP-Standard control. The Chinese
supported and used the "ethnic-Albanian rebels," since the breakup of
Yugoslavia in the early 1990's, to ensure continuous unrest in the
whole region around Kosovo, Serbia, Bosnia and Macedonia, and thus no
pipeline. Ever wonder why the Chinese embassy in Belgrade was
"accidently" bombed and obliterated in 1999? The US Air Force claimed
the old street maps their pilots were reading didn't show the Chinese
Embassy. You can fool some of the people some of the time, but not
always. Within a year the Empire of Energy would find an alternative.
To most Americans and to the rest of the world that alternative would
look like a very strange Presidential election.
(End of Chapter Three)
For those Americans who argued that there was no oil in Vietnam to
fight about:
Vietnam is increasingly an important supplier of oil to regional
markets and may emerge as a significant natural gas exporter in the
future. The making of Vietnam's oil giant
By Andrew Symon
HO CHI MINH CITY - PetroVietnam, Vietnam's dominant state oil-and-gas
group, is bidding to emerge as a new force in international energy
markets. Following the proven model of China's successful state-owned
petroleum companies, CNOOC, CNPC-PetroChina and Sinopec, and with an
eye on Malaysia's highly profitable state-owned Petronas, PetroVietnam
is leveraging off its strong domestic position to develop a growing
international portfolio of energy interests and operations. Crude-oil
exports have powered Vietnam's recent rapid economic growth,
representing the country's largest single export item
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/II25Ae02.html
http://www.oilcompanies.net/oil1.htm
Let us prey.
Take the tour on Nam
http://pzzzz.tripod.com/nampictour.html
Killing Without Conscience : Iraq - The Hidden War
The War for Oil
This is the story of the hidden agenda behind the invasion of Iraq.
How much has this war really been about control over a dwindling
resource?
Middle East
In the pipeline: More regime change
By Hooman Peimani
An Israeli daily, Ha'aretz, has reported that Israel is seriously
considering restarting a strategically important oil pipeline that
once transferred oil from the Iraqi city of Mosul to Israel's northern
port of Haifa. Given the Israeli claim of a positive US approach to
the plan, the Israeli project provides grounds for a theory that the
ongoing war against Iraq is in part a joint US, British and Israeli
design for reshaping the Middle East to serve their particular
interests, including their oil requirements.
According to the daily, Israeli National Infrastructure Minister Yosef
Paritzky considers the pipeline project as economically justifiable as
it would reduce the country's cost of oil imports. This is currently
very high, as Israel imports oil from Russia. There would also be a
strategic justification for the project, as importing oil from an oil
supplier in Israel's close proximity would increase its fuel security
and would address its major handicap, that is, its total dependence on
imported fuel from far-away suppliers. While living in the oil-rich
Middle East, the Israelis cannot count on regional oil exporters
because of the existing Arab-Israeli conflict. Prior to the 1979
Iranian revolution, Iran, which was on friendly terms with Israel,
provided its oil requirements. That arrangement ended in 1979 when the
new Iranian revolutionary regime cut ties with Israel.
Paritzky has requested an assessment of the Mosul-Haifa pipeline's
current state, which ceased to operate in 1948. Presumably, the
pipeline will require major repair and/or upgrading, if not an
overhaul, as it has not been in use for more than half a century.
However, its full operation, including the required repair work, needs
the consent of Iraq, the would-be oil supplier, and Syria, a country
neighboring both Iraq and Israel, through which the pipeline passes.
Iraqi consent will be out of the question as long as the current
regime of Saddam Hussein is in power. As acknowledged by the Israeli
minister, a prerequisite for the project is, therefore, a new regime
in Baghdad with friendly ties with Israel. However, such a regime, if
ever it comes to power, will still require Syria's consent to
operationalize the pipeline. Given the overall political environment
in the Middle East and Israel's continued occupation of Syria's Golan
Heights, the existing Syrian regime will never grant its consent as
long as the status quo prevails. As stated by the Iranian government,
during the Iran-Iraq war (1980-88) when Iraq enjoyed cordial and close
relations with Israel's mentor, the United States, Israel tried, but
failed, to resume the oil flow through the pipeline. Syria, a friend
of Iran and an enemy of Iraq, blocked the flow of Iraqi oil.
Hence, unless the pipeline were redirected through Jordan, another
country bordering Israel and Iraq with normalized relations with
Israel, the pipeline project will require a different regime in Syria.
In other words, regime change in both Iraq and Syria is the
prerequisite for the project. As Paritzky did not mention a
redirecting option, it is safe to suggest that the Israelis are also
optimistic about a regime change in Syria in the near future.
Oil pipelines are a highly vulnerable means of exporting oil,
requiring a predictable long-term reliability of the countries through
which they pass. Knowing this, the Israelis can only begin their
technical assessment of the pipeline once they are convinced that the
existing political barriers can be overcome. This requires new regimes
in Baghdad and Damascus.
According to the Israeli minister, the United States will back his
project since the pipeline would bring Iraqi oil directly from Iraq to
the Mediterranean. In such a case, the Americans could bypass the
Persian Gulf for their imported Iraqi oil, while having secured access
to the world's second-largest oil reserves. Especially since the early
1990s, they have repeatedly expressed their concern about over-
reliance on the Persian Gulf for their oil imports, which contains
more than 60 percent of the world's proven oil reserves. Given the
concentration of the major oil exporters in that region, its
instability could interrupt or completely stop the flow of oil by oil
tankers, with a consequent major impact on the US economy, as it is so
dependent on oil.
To decrease their vulnerability to such a worst-case scenario, the
Americans have sought to diversify their oil suppliers. Apart from the
Caspian oil-exporters, they have resorted to non-OPEC (Organization of
Petroleum Exporting Countries) African countries (Chad and Angola),
whose resources are also closer to the United States than those of the
Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea. However, these alternative suppliers
could only allay the US fear for a while, given the small size of
their oil deposits. Thus, in the long run, the US will have to import
heavily from the Persian Gulf region, where existing oil reserves will
outlast those of other regions, and while some of its oil-rich
countries, such as Iran, keep finding new oilfields.
Given this situation, finding reliable alternative export routes and
means to sea routes and oil tankers for Persian Gulf oil exports is
the long-term solution for the Americans requiring an increasing
amount of imported oil. In this regard, land-based pipelines to carry
oil to easily accessible warm-water open seas such as the
Mediterranean would be a suitable option. A fully operational Mosul-
Haifa pipeline could address that US problem, while satisfying
Israel's oil requirements at same time.
The Israeli oil pipeline plan, though, runs contrary to the stated US
war objectives in Iraq. The two key members of the "coalition of the
willing" - the United States and the United Kingdom - have rejected
oil as a motivation for the war, a point not taken seriously by many
all over the world. Nevertheless, the Israeli plan, the US-stated goal
of securing Iraqi oilfields, including those of Mosul, and the
declared US objective of a regime change in Iraq offer some evidence
to the contrary.
Against this background, the US government's growing anti-Syrian
rhetoric, including accusing Syria of supplying military equipment to
Iraq, may well be the initial stage toward the expansion of the war to
Syria. If this happens, it could lead to a regime change there to
serve various purposes, including the cooperation of Syria in future
oil exports via the Mosul-Haifa pipeline.
Dr Hooman Peimani works as an independent consultant with
international organizations in Geneva and does research in
international relations.
(©2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact
***@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication
policies.)
The Money Programme broadcast Wednesday 26 March 7.30pm BBC2
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8582.htm
Oil - Oil and world power
http://www.americanforeignrelations.com/O-W/Oil-Oil-and-world-power.htm
Oil company wars produce work for many besides military ...Oil
Companies Hiring In Afghanistan/Iraq. Companies Hiring Now
Jobs with Contractors in Afghanistan and the surrounding Countries
Places like Afghanistan and other overseas job market in the region
are changing fast. Employment opportunities are plenty, even though,
the number of people leaving the Armed Forces flood the market with
military personnel with overseas experience and security clearances.
In addition, there are thousands of contractors moving from one
contracting company to another. But, despite these prevailing market
conditions, with the right training and knowledge about jobs, one can
find lots of well paid employment opportunities with American, British
and German Contractors in Afghanistan and other areas surrounding it.
Oil pipeline through Afghanistan to Arabian Sea will not be complete
until 2014. Jobs will be available even beyond completion of
pipeline, especially in security work.
This pipeline will carry $3-5 trillion in oil and natural gas from the
Caspian Sea basin via Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan,where
ships docked in Arabian Sea ports will then carry that fuel to energy
hungry Asia.
This will yield enormous profits for investors,and the atmosphere will
continue to heat from the increasing use of those fossil fuels
SEE Map
http://ringnebula.com/Oil/Pipeline.htm
Vets looking for work should get in touch with the State Department.
With this new Taliban attack activity, more Americans will be killed,
especially the troops assigned to guard the newly constructed oil
pipeline running through Afghanistan to the oil tankers waiting in the
Arabian Sea and bound for American and British refineries. The oil
compnies are hiring , especially returning veterans willing to return
to Afghanistan and take up the jobs that the military has been working
at. The jobs pay well ..... contracts must be signed promising that
the employees will remain for a specific length of time. However, the
risks are great and applicants should be warned of the dangers.
The oil companies had experienced severe opposition from the local
population until President Obama sent an additional 40,000 troops to
protect the workers building the long awaited pipeline to the Arbian
Sea.. Still, the locals cannot be trusted to permit the line to be
completed.
Jobs in Afghanistan - Jobline International For several international
companies, we're looking to recruit:
Oil Companies Hiring In Afghanistan/Iraq. Companies Hiring Now
Salary: Negotiable
Job Placement Service for Jobs with Contractors in Afghanistan
Experts in pipe fitting a priority... high paying contracts guaranteed
employment thru 3/2014. The hiring companies are a lot more secretive
than they used to be and only few jobs get advertised. ..hiring former
military with pipeline security experience.
WILL DO ANY WORK ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD OIL;@GAS OR SECURITY IN
AFGANISTAN, . ADB staff and staff consultant experts are analyzing the
demand ..
Archived Oil and Gas Jobs in Afghanistan | Oil and Gas Jobs
Please remember - With troops returning home Afghanistan is currently
a more dangerous place for foreigners to work in, so do not apply for
any position unless you are aware of the risks ..After all, oil is
what this war is all about and losing Americans for oil is not a
popular topic.
Administration Jobs in Afghanistan Alternative Energy Jobs in
Afghanistan
Commercial/Financial Jobs in Afghanistan Design/Software Jobs in
Afghanistan
Drilling Jobs in Afghanistan Engineering Jobs in Afghanistan
Environment Jobs in Afghanistan FEA/FEM Jobs in Afghanistan
Geoscience Jobs in Afghanistan Health & Safety Jobs in Afghanistan
Human Resources Jobs in Afghanistan Inspection/Expediting Jobs in
Afghanistan
IT/Communications Jobs in Afghanistan Legal Jobs in Afghanistan
Logistics/Transport Jobs in Afghanistan Management Jobs in
Afghanistan
Marine (Diving/ROV) Jobs in Afghanistan Marine (Ship) Jobs in
Afghanistan
Mining Jobs in Afghanistan Nuclear Jobs in Afghanistan
Operations Jobs in Afghanistan Other Jobs in Afghanistan
Personnel Training Jobs in Afghanistan Plant (Refinery, Gas...) Jobs
in Afghanistan
Procurement Jobs in Afghanistan Quality (QA/QC) Jobs in Afghanistan
Sales/Marketing Jobs in Afghanistan Technician Level Jobs in
Afghanistan
Trades (Skilled) Jobs in Afghanistan
http://www.oil-offshore-marine.com/directory/country/
http://www.jobline.net/jobafghan1.htm
Turkmenistan - Afghanistan - Pakistan Pipeline Employment Availble
Now.
If you intend to be part of that effort, you have to understand that
conditions are harsh, primitive and hazardous. Prior experience in the
military will be a big help in adapting to the environment and doing
the job. Most jobs will be offered for 12-month tours, with options to
extend.Work also available in Iraq's newly opened oil fields.
Veterans welcome to apply.
The number of interested companies will depend on the skills you
offer. These companies will then directly contact you, when they have
an opening and need your skills, agreeing directly with you their
employment conditions.
War is the Health of the American Empire.
Join in the fight for world oil domination.
